Who Do They Hate More?

John McCain OR...the NEW YORK TIMES?!?!?

C'mon, it's a no brainer. The New York Liberal Times, period.

John McCain is now raking in the dough because the New York Times wrote a story about who he is as a person, currently and historically.

No, it was not a story about McCain cheating on his wife, or having an affair. Rather, it was a story that mentioned how certain employees of John McCain believed he may have been crossing the line, and whether he was, or not, seemed to be putting himself in a bad situation. Furthermore, it was a story about John McCain's past, and how he has been a champion of the people versus the special interests, even though his past is littered with examples of hypocrisy.

See, that's how it works. You can be a visible Senator who is a hypocrite, but when you step up to the big podium, everything you do will scrutinized, including your past, and all of the flaws that come with that. John McCain has a a flawed past.

Basically, McCain is a guy who got caught with is hand in the cookie jar, and then decided to rail against the cookie jar. Lucky for McCain, on some level, he was a POW. Had he not been he would not even be a politician right now. But he was, so he is.

Bottom line, the New York Times, like every other publication, is calling into question who this guy is against the backdrop of who he portends to be. The article did not say unequivocally that he did something wrong, unlike FOX NEWS and the NY POST do about the Clintons EVERY DAY. Rather, it questioned whether or not who he claims he is actually is who he is, which is exactly what happens to people who step to the big podium.

But now, the cash is flowing. Conservatives are behind him. Because suppressing the New York Times is bigger to them than who runs the United States.

You're all scumbags, period. Go Eff yourselves.

(not editing)

They Tried

Remember the prosecutor in Arizona who was fired, one of the 8? Well, if you don't, here was that story:

PHOENIX The state Democratic Party wants the Senate Judiciary Committee to look into a possible connection between the ouster of Arizona U.S. Attorney Paul Charlton and his investigation of Rep. Rick Renzi, R-Ariz.

Two weeks after Charlton was ordered to give up his post, he sent an e-mail in December to a top Justice Department official asking how to handle questions that his ouster was connected to the Renzi probe, The Arizona Republic reported Wednesday.

Charlton, one of eight federal prosecutors forced to resign last year, never received a written response.

His e-mail was among more than 3,000 pages of records the Bush administration turned over to Congress late Monday as part of an ongoing congressional investigation into the ousters. Democrats released the documents Tuesday.

Congressional investigators and others trying to figure out if Charlton was scuttled by partisan politics.

Well, guess what happened today:

Rep. Rick Renzi, the Arizona Republican indicted today for extortion, money laundering, wire fraud and other charges relating to a land deal in his home, now faces pressure from the GOP House leadership to step down.

“I have made it clear that I will hold our Members to the highest standards of ethical conduct,” House Minority Leader John A. Boehner said today in a statement. “The charges contained in this indictment are completely unacceptable for a Member of Congress, and I strongly urge Rep. Renzi to seriously consider whether he can continue to effectively represent his constituents under these circumstances.”

The 26-page federal indictment unsealed in Arizona this morning accuses Renzi and two former business partners of conspiring to promote the sale of land that buyers could swap for property owned by the federal government, the Associated Press is reporting. One of Renzi's associates netted $4.5 million in the deal.

Renzi is a state co-chair for presidential candidate John McCain. In Indianapolis today, the Arizona senator told reporters, “I’m sorry. I feel for the family. As you know he has 12 children.”

Yeah, John, that's why your party needs to start believing in birth control.

So do a search of Indicted Congressman and see who there is more of.

Take one guess.


Nope, wrong, it's not the "party without morals." I can understand why you'd think that though.

Hilarious!

Maxim reviews Black Crowes Album Without Ever Having Heard It.

Awesome.

Dear Driver

Wipe the fucking snow off the roof and hood of your car.


Unreal.

Tourette Syndrome?

Looks pretty comfy.







What a joke.

Be Careful!

This guy is really getting out there on a limb with this endorsement.